Monday, 2 February 2015

Norwegian Instruments

Norwegian Instruments

I have been developing a huge interest in instruments native to different countries. The country whose instruments are inspiring me the most right now is Norway. I have a love for Scandinavian music, so it seems quite natural that I have developed this interest. I have done some brief research about Norway’s traditional instruments, and will give an overview, but one particular instrument that I wanted to learn more about is the Hardanger Fiddle. The other instruments I will discuss are the Langeleik, Bukkehorn, Neverlur, Tungehorn and Psalmodikon. I’d like to mention that there are other traditional Norwegian instruments, but I will only be discussing the ones mentioned.

The Langeleik is a traditional droned Zither, a type of stringed instrument consisting of a box with one or more strings attached across it played horizontally. The earliest recorded Langeleik was in 1524 and was found in the Oppland region of Norway. The earliest recorded documentation of a Langeleik was from around the early 17th century, so the instrument has certainly been around since the middle ages, if not before then. The actual instrument is made of a wooden rectangle that acts as a resonance box it has one melody string and up to eight sympathetic strings. There are frets underneath the melody string forming a diatonic major scale, so a Langeleik can’t play chromatic scales. Although the instrument is usually tuned to A major, music for the Langeleik is written in C major, supposedly because it is easier to read. Older Langeleik used to have frets that were an interval of a fifth apart, but that gradually changed as music developed to be more melodic through the ages, until it had a major scale.  In all the centuries it was in existence, the Langeleik was popular throughout Norway, and was used in types of dances such as Gammeldans (old dance) and Bygdedans (village dance). With the introduction of popular music in the 20th century, the playing of all traditional instruments lessened, but there are still communities throughout Norway who still make and play the instruments. There are different styles of Langeleik made in Norway today. In Telemark, the Langeleiks made are straight and thin, whereas the Langeleiks of Valdres are made with a curve at the end.


 The Bukkehorn is a very simple instrument and one of my favourite instruments that exist. Bukkehorns are made from the horn of a male goat, and then a whole for the mouth is drilled as well as up to four finger holes. The process of making them is quite interesting, and I watched a video that shows this process. First you have to get a goat’s horn (the goats are usually five to seven years old) then soak it in boiling water until the inner of the horn is soft enough to gouge out.  Then it is soaked again this time to get the cartilage out, and then the holes are drilled. Traditionally, the Bukkehorn was not an instrument played for dances, it had a practical use by milkmaids and shepherds to scare away predators, or signal to each other. At this point, the Bukkehorn didn’t even have finger holes. They were added later on and it then because possible to play simple melodies on them. Now, there are a few musicians who still play the Bukkehorn, one of the most famous being Sissel Morken Gullord. The Bukkehorn has a beautiful sound; I think it almost sounds like someone singing. It has a clear rich sound that resembles a Flugelhorn.


The Neverlur is probably the most ancient Scandinavian instrument. It is also known as a birch trumpet. The clue is in the name here, because the Neverlur is a very long trumpet made out of spruce and covered in birch bark. The Neverlur dates back to around 805 AC, so is thought to have been used by the Vikings as an instrument of war to scare the enemy and indicate when to charge into battle, and research also shows that it was used to communicate from one ship to another. Evidence that the Neverlur was used in Viking times is found from the Oseberg ship burial where one of these instruments was discovered. Later on in history, it was used by milkmaids to call to one another and warn off predators.  Considering this instrument does not have any finger wholes, I find it remarkable that you are able to get around ten tones from a natural scale just by varying the way you blow it. Lurs are about 1 meter long and are made in three different ways; hollowed out, striped wood that is then stuck back together again, and a piece of wood (spruce or birch) wrapped together in birch bark. The shape is a long tube with a bell at the end just like a modern brass instrument, and the top would be shaped into a mouthpiece.

The Tungehorn is very similar to the Bukkehorn, but is defined by its single reed instead of just a hole. Nobody is sure when the Tungehorn came into existence. It was surely after the Bukkehorn, but there is much controversy over whether the Clarinet was invented before the Tungehorn or not. Instead of having practical uses originally, the Tungehorn does just seem to be used for dances, and is common in Norwegian folk music. It is also made from goats horns like he Bukkehorn, but it can also be made from a cow’s horn. It is hollowed out in the same way, but with the Tungehorn, four to eight finger holes can be added. This makes it good for folk music, because it is easier to get a varied melody. The reed is most commonly made from juniper but also spruce maple or birch.



The Psalmodikon is an instrument rather like the Langeleik, since it too is made of a long rectangle, but it only has one string instead of around eight, and can be bowed or plucked. Essentially it’s the Langeleik without the drone strings. It was developed in the early 19th century as an instrument that could be played in churches and schools. Because the Psalmodikon is a plain, un- decorative instrument, it was seen as more appropriate to play in church, unlike the other dance instruments. This meant is was a good accompaniment to hymns, and was easy to learn, because of it only having a single string. It was also useful to be used in churches, because it was very cheap to build and was a good alternative to the more expensive organ, and worked just as well when providing a melody. When the churches managed to get enough money for an organ, the Psalmodikon became out of fashion by the mid-20th century. It is still used today by folk musicians in Scandinavia, and is gathering interest from different parts of the globe that have Scandinavian ancestors.


The Hardanger Fiddle is a traditional Norwegian Fiddle, dating from the mid-17th century. It is different from the normal violin since as well as having four melody strings; it also has four or five sympathetic strings. Sympathetic strings differ from drones, because they are each tuned to a different note, to compliment the tunings of the melody strings. The Hardanger Fiddle’s sympathetic strings are not actually bowed, but are fitted in a gap cut into the bridge. They resonate when the Fiddle is played. The Hardanger Fiddle originates from the Hardanger Fjord in the south of Norway, and was mainly played by musicians in the south west of the country. Nevertheless, it is thought of as the national instrument of Norway. The Hardanger Fiddle was used as a dance instrument, and there are thought to be around a thousand separate dances written for this instrument. Most commonly used for Bygdedans and Gammeldans but also played as a bride was going to church. This is interesting, seeing as the church was not fond of the Hardanger Fiddle at all, and at one point in the 19th century, many Hardanger Fiddles were destroyed and burned because the Christians believed that it was bad for the soul to play these instruments, and that they encouraged sinful activities. The Christians believed that people were taught the Hardanger Fiddle by the devil or even the Nøkken or Fossegrim; Scandinavian mythical creature that lives in the water. The character Fossegrim is believed to have played the Fiddle to lure people into the water to drown, so it isn’t surprising that the Christian people of Norway believed that the Hardanger Fiddle was bad. The tuning of the Hardanger fiddle’s melody strings are usually A, D, A and E which is not the common Violin tuning used today. There is also a special type of tuning for the Hardanger Fiddle’s melody strings called ‘Troll Tuning’ this is where the melody strings are tuned to A, E, A and C#. This tuning would be used to play songs about the devil and used for mourning songs. The Hardanger Fiddle survived, even though many were burnt, and it was considered a sin to play. People did keep on playing the Hardanger Fiddle, and it is a very common folk instrument in Scandinavia. There are even some concertos written for the Hardanger Fiddle, by Geirr Tveitt.
 I am interested to see the use of Norwegian Folk instruments in popular culture today, with the Bukkehorn being used in a recent Disney film; ‘Frozen’, and the Hardanger Fiddle incorporated into the score from the ‘Lord of the Rings’ films. All the instruments I have mentioned here have survived time, even since the Viking period, and are still used today. Some out of cultural and historic interest and others in modern folk groups, and even in Film scores.




Bibliography:


Images:

https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&authuser=0&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1366&bih=643&q=langeleik&oq=langeleik&gs_l=img.3..0j0i24l3.662.4108.0.4540.11.8.1.1.1.0.393.620.2-1j1.2.0.msedr...0...1ac.1.61.img..8.3.619.dHY3gTG77lg#imgdii=_&imgrc=pQEh-5Sn2IPJ3M%253A%3ByVW75xKIwc6g9M%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fvestre-slidre.kulturskole.no%252FKulturskulen_web%252FLangeleik_files%252Furl.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fvestre-slidre.kulturskole.no%252FKulturskulen_web%252FLangeleik.html%3B271%3B168


https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&authuser=0&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1366&bih=643&q=langeleik&oq=langeleik&gs_l=img.3..0j0i24l3.662.4108.0.4540.11.8.1.1.1.0.393.620.2-1j1.2.0.msedr...0...1ac.1.61.img..8.3.619.dHY3gTG77lg#hl=en&authuser=0&tbm=isch&q=bukkehorn&imgdii=_&imgrc=MnvDMEX9dR7AqM%253A%3B4pLK7LaxdIjrRM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fhome.himolde.no%252F~molka%252FFekte%252Fbukkehorn-prillarhornet.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fforums.taleworlds.com%252Findex.php%253Ftopic%253D78043.0%3B429%3B209



https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&authuser=0&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1366&bih=643&q=langeleik&oq=langeleik&gs_l=img.3..0j0i24l3.662.4108.0.4540.11.8.1.1.1.0.393.620.2-1j1.2.0.msedr...0...1ac.1.61.img..8.3.619.dHY3gTG77lg#hl=en&authuser=0&tbm=isch&q=+bukkehorn&imgdii=_&imgrc=AJxZWHDWG4UzlM%253A%3BcV3gqlgPtcl9MM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fupload.wikimedia.org%252Fwikipedia%252Fcommons%252F6%252F6d%252FBukkehorn.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fen.wikipedia.org%252Fwiki%252FBukkehorn%3B472%3B256


https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&authuser=0&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1366&bih=643&q=langeleik&oq=langeleik&gs_l=img.3..0j0i24l3.662.4108.0.4540.11.8.1.1.1.0.393.620.2-1j1.2.0.msedr...0...1ac.1.61.img..8.3.619.dHY3gTG77lg#hl=en&authuser=0&tbm=isch&q=neverlur&imgdii=_&imgrc=bJeqVWJ4QgLnuM%253A%3BKhNafCrFWYcCLM%3Bhttps%253A%252F%252Fc1.staticflickr.com%252F5%252F4124%252F5197335249_24ca42647f_z.jpg%3Bhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.flickr.com%252Fphotos%252F56208170%2540N04%252F5197335249%252Fgalleries%252F%3B518%3B524


https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&authuser=0&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1366&bih=643&q=langeleik&oq=langeleik&gs_l=img.3..0j0i24l3.662.4108.0.4540.11.8.1.1.1.0.393.620.2-1j1.2.0.msedr...0...1ac.1.61.img..8.3.619.dHY3gTG77lg#hl=en&authuser=0&tbm=isch&q=psalmodikon&imgdii=_&imgrc=uuV6egODk-pR9M%253A%3B4RW_tPh-oNwHAM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.everythingiscopy.com%252Fimages%252FCulture%252FPsalmodikon-500.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.snipview.com%252Fq%252FPsalmodicon%3B500%3B108


https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&authuser=0&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1366&bih=643&q=langeleik&oq=langeleik&gs_l=img.3..0j0i24l3.662.4108.0.4540.11.8.1.1.1.0.393.620.2-1j1.2.0.msedr...0...1ac.1.61.img..8.3.619.dHY3gTG77lg#hl=en&authuser=0&tbm=isch&q=hardanger+fiddle&imgdii=_&imgrc=tzrCmr9vAofJSM%253A%3BmezDzSHKywex7M%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252F4.bp.blogspot.com%252F-32Li1cJDBuk%252FUBHxdILkc8I%252FAAAAAAAABIc%252FKfByfRpKb4Q%252Fs1600%252FHardanger%252BFiddle%252B05.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Finstrumundo.blogspot.com%252F2012%252F07%252Fviolin-hardanger-hardanger-fiddle.html%3B600%3B391









Sunday, 1 February 2015

Gig Review - Opeth and Alcest

Back on the 14th of October 2014, I attended an event in the O2 ABC in Glasgow, which was part of Opeth’s European tour following the release of their 11th studio album, ‘Pale Communion’. Last time I saw Opeth in the same venue, they were touring with Anathema, but this time they were accompanied by French Post-Black Metal band; Alcest. I was really interested to hear Alcest perform, because I wanted to hear how they sounded live compared to their usual smooth production.
Opeth are a Swedish death metal band who are very significant in the world of metal and have been about since 1990. They have an incredibly unique style and have developed a large fan base. They are characterised by a mix of traditional death metal combined with intricate melodic sections featuring chromatic and modal movement, and use of irregular and compound time signatures is quite common. They often use mixtures of seven eight and six eight. Their style manages to sound unbelievably brutal, but also obviously has jazz and folk influences. It is this unique approach to metal that makes them one of the most influential metal bands around today.
Alcest are a French post-black or Shoe-gaze-black metal band who formed in the early 2000s. They are not as popular as Opeth, but their beautiful melodies combined with black metal drumming and vocals are something that people are becoming interested in. Their style uses simple melodies played by clean guitars and vocals, and is combined with harsh black metal shrieks and a drumming style that goes from simple time rhythms to ruthless blast beats. Their lyrical subject focuses on dreams and the songs are mostly about some sort of dream world, all sung in French. The fact you can’t understand it enhances the idea of it being a bit dreamy. This band is such a great compliment to Opeth because both do not stick to one style, they incorporate the unexpected, some sort of “Marmite” genre splicing.
When I arrived at the venue, I was not at all surprised to see a real mixed crowd. There were a huge number of middle aged people there for a start, this may be due to the fact that Opeth are quite an old band now, so are pulling in some die-hard fans from all over the country. There were also – and I hate to categorise – a significant number of obviously non-metal heads there; people who looked a little bit awkward in fully buttoned shirts. I was really pleased to see this because it just shows that these bands, who have a variety of influences, certainly draw in a varied crowd. Also, Alcest were likely to pull in a more “hipster” fan-base due to their late move to a more poppy sound. After this spot of people watching, the lights suddenly dimmed and Alcest walked on stage.
Their set list included a sensible mix of new and old material, including probably one of their most famous and certainly my favourite; ‘Autre Temps’. I was slightly disappointed they missed out the introduction to this song, but then it occurred to me that quite a lot of songs had been tailored for live performance. They absolutely perfected the post black metal genre, characterised by their slow melodies using major scales, often in three four time, giving a really sort of nostalgic feel to their songs, assisted by Neige’s soft innocent tenor voice. They use lots of synth sounds to give a sort of ethereal tone to the music, and what disappoints me is that it’s all pre-recorded; they could definitely make a better live show if they had someone to play keyboards for them on the night. Another thing different live, was that they missed out all the spine-tingling vocal harmony that is present in their recordings. This made the live experience a bit bland. Seeing as their music is quite simple already, to be truly powerful live, they could do without striping down the parts. I found their older music is more interesting and has more depth, and their latest album features hardly any black metal which leaves them basically being indie; a bit boring really. I was really disappointed with their live sound, because the sound engineers were obviously not aware that this was a very melodic band since I could hardly hear any treble at all. This major oversight was fairly disappointing; however it was nice to actually see Alcest live.
Opeth had a much more dramatic entry, the crowd was going totally ballistic for them. Some spotlights highlighted the position where the band members were to stand, and apart from that, everything was pitch black, there was a huge aura of anticipation. Naturally, their opening track was the first off their new album which was just stunning to hear live. Opeth have evolved over the past couple of years into more of a prog rock/heavy rock band, obviously these genres have always been underlying in the bands complexed style, but are now more apparent. ‘Eternal Rains Will come’ just shows off their recent evolution magnificently. Unlike Alcest, Opeth didn't skimp on their introductions. ‘Eternal Rains’ three minute lead up until the first chorus was all there, and sounded precisely just like the recorded copy. I have to admit; I had not done much research on the production of this latest album, and just assumed Åkerfeldt’s voice had been multi tracked to achieve the perfect tight harmonies, but was actually overjoyed to see most members singing. Opeth’s set list included a range of their music. The crowd was shouting for ‘old stuff’ and as well as playing a lot of new material, they really did go back a long way, including a song off their first album ‘Orchid’, which after all these years (thirty) was still incredibly well performed and was really impressive. They were also churning out the favourites from ‘Still Life’, ‘Watershed’ and ‘Blackwater Park’. One thing I love about Opeth is that they incorporate a lot of modern jazz rhythms and keyboards into their music. Live, Axenrot was on top form, with really accurate and complex rhythms, and so was Svalberg; using jazzy organ sounds, suspensions, seventh and sixth chords.  Vocal wise, Åkerfeldt’s contrast of deep chesty growls and crisp clean vocals was just as perfect as ever: probably one of the top voices in metal today. Such a powerful voice along with the heavy instrumental accompaniment makes a really dramatic sound. Contrastingly, Opeth have a tendency to sound quite folk. The mixture of modal scales used by the guitars and Åkerfeldt’s clean vocals is such a change from their heavier sound, but to me it is undeniably awesome the way they manage to fit jazz, folk, prog rock, and death metal even into one song. It is also impressive the way they sound exactly like they do recorded when they play live as well. The performance was fantastic; both times I've seen them they have failed to disappoint.
 The crowd interaction between both bands was hugely contrasting. Alcest basically walked on stage, said nothing the whole way through their performance and then left. This may have something to do with the fact that they are not great English speakers. Maybe they did not feel comfortable speaking to a crowd? Also, their music isn't what you’d call get-up and go, it’s very relaxing, so there isn't much spec for getting the crowd all excited. It is more music that the crowd witnesses rather than gets involved in. However, Opeth’s crowd interaction is always one of the best parts of their live performance. Åkerfeldt is actually a real comedian, previously declaring the name of their band was ABBA and subsequently breaking out into a brief rendition of ‘Super Trouper’. They literally have the crowd in tears of laughter, and are obviously very comfortable when it comes to talking to the audience.
As far as stage presence goes, both bands were very different again. From the moment Alcest started playing, they just stood in a straight line, which was completely uninspiring. They also had close to no interaction with each other. The whole thing looked quite awkward and boring. In contrast, Opeth made sure they positioned themselves in a more natural looking way so that they could actually see each other. They were obviously passionate about their music, and were making clear visual communication with each other, as well as walking about the stage, showing they were relaxed and enjoying the moment, rather than Alcest’s rather wooden performance. For Opeth, it is probably more important to be able to see each other since their irregular rhythmical structures involve long pauses, so it is necessary to be able to see one another to know exactly when to pick up the song. Alcest however have simple rhythms, where nothing peculiar happens, so communication within the band is not so important, but I feel it is crucial in presenting yourself as an inspiring musician.

Overall I was thoroughly impressed with the whole performance, and it was a great opportunity to see two of my favourite bands. Alcest did sound good live, but it wasn't all there. The lack of harmony and good performance was a bit deflating. Also, their live sound is definitely not as good as on recording since I could barely hear any treble. I'm curious to see whether it is just the sound engineers who got it wrong on the night, or, that they really don’t sound good live. In my opinion, a band should always sound the same live as recorded, and, while Alcest didn't live up to this expectation, Opeth most certainly did. Their old and new material sounded just as impressive live as on CD, which was a huge achievement seeing as they played songs dating back to the early 90s. They put on a totally inspiring performance, and are a band I would never miss the opportunity to see again.